Lieback placed the coffee cup between her knees and pulled back the lid in order to do so. However, there is more to this case than most people know.
Mcdonald's restaurants, also known as the mcdonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the united states over tort reform.
What really happened in the mcdonald's coffee case. The mcdonald’s hot coffee lawsuit created a lot of hype, especially by john stossel at abc news. After the car stopped, she tried to hold the cup securely between her knees while removing the lid. Stella liebeck made national headlines in 1992 when she sued mcdonald’s after spilling a scalding cup of hot coffee on her lap.
But what most people do. The mcdonald's hot coffee case didn't change much. It’s treated as a classic example of judicial overreach and greed:
Liebeck was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her grandson. Stella was a passenger in her grandson’s car and he pulled over so that stella could put cream and sugar in the coffee. But mcdonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial.
After a jury trial, ms. After the car stopped, she tried to hold the cup securely between her knees while removing the lid. Stella liebeck, 79 years old, was sitting in the passenger seat of her grandson’s car having purchased a cup of mcdonald’s coffee.
A woman, driving in her car while holding mcdonald’s coffee between her legs, spills some of the coffee on herself. Liebeck was found to be partially to blame for her injuries due to the way she removed the lid from her coffee cup. Her grandson was driving the car and had pulled to a stop in the mcdonald’s parking lot so that she could add cream and sugar to her coffee before drinking it.
In the process she spilled the coffee over her lap and groin. Liebeck was 79 years old when this incident occurred. The facts of the case:
Mcdonald’s had faced claims from more than 700 people prior to 1992, who all claimed they were burned by coffee that was served too hot. Leibeck was awarded $2.9 million dollars for her injuries. Liebeck’s grandson pulled over and stopped the vehicle so liebeck could add cream and sugar to her coffee.
Revisiting the mcdonald’s hot coffee case. Attorney tracy jenks tried the case for mcdonald’s and argued that liebeck bore personal responsibility because she spilled the coffee on herself and that mcdonald’s coffee wasn’t any hotter than the coffee at other fast food restaurants. No one is in favor of frivolous cases and outlandish results but it is important to understand some key facts that were not reported in the stories about the case.
Her award was reduced by the percentage that the jury found her to blame for her injuries. She sued mcdonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. What really happened in the mcdonald’s coffee case?
Mcdonald's still hasn't learned its lesson. She said the reason the coffee was so hot was because that’s what customers wanted. What really happened in the mcdonald’s hot coffee case.
Recall that the case arose when mcdonald’s coffee spilled on the lap of ms. It’s been a few years but it is still remembered by many, especially by those who use it as an example of a tort system having gone wild. (most people assumed that was the end of the story, but it wasn't.
The situation happened at a mcdonald’s in albuquerque, new mexico, in 1992. So, to force mcdonald’s to change and to use this coffee woman to set the precedent, they decided to go after mcdonald’s for 2 days worth of coffee sales. She sued mcdonald’s and a jury awarded $2.7 million.
In the mcdonald’s case, ms. Other people have reported similar injuries after spilling mcdonald's coffee. However, the cup tipped over, pouring scalding hot coffee onto her lap.
The jury found out that over 700 people had been burned by mcdonald’s before this, and they had done nothing to change it. The lawsuit had the whole country talking. Remember the 1992 mcdonald’s “hot coffee” case in which a 79 year old woman spilled a cup of coffee and suffered burns?
What really happened in the hot coffee case? Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. Did you ever wonder what the facts were in the famous (or infamous) mcdonald’s coffee spill case?
Mcdonald’s did it on purpose. At the time, mcdonald's still kept its coffee at 180 degrees fahrenheit. The strange case of spilled coffee.
The fact is that the judge presiding over the case believed that mcdonalds had engaged in willful, wanton, and reckless behavior, but still decided that stella would receive less than 20% of the punitive damage's total. The jury essentially awarded stella an amount that equaled two days' worth of sales from mcdonald's coffee sales.